FAILURE MAP

Understand the failure.
Verify the repair.

Small, reproducible software failures. The broken implementation, the fix that didn’t work, and the one that passed—preserved together.

Explore the cases ↓How results are verified ↗
100840Executable case variants
20168Distinct failure mechanisms
302520Executed implementations
20168Open-access cases

WHAT THE ARCHIVE CONTAINS

100840 executable cases. 20168 are open.

Every case records the implementation that fails, the fix that did not work, and the repair that passed its checks—with recorded outputs and source hashes. This release adds 100840 cases across 20168 failure mechanisms and 254 domains.

The open tier gives you the failure and the unsuccessful fix for one case in every mechanism. The remaining 80672 cases, 5 variants per mechanism, are member-only: the verified repair, its recorded checks, and the full fixture suite are held in the member archive. Read the methodology ↗

A RECORD OF WHAT WENT WRONG

Browse the archive / 100840

Python · Standard library
REFERENCEFAILURE MECHANISMDOMAINACCESS
FA-89101

Unknown input bit treated as a missing transition · case 01

An 'x' input leaves the machine in a definite state instead of the unknown state.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89102

Unknown input bit treated as a missing transition · case 02

An 'x' input leaves the machine in a definite state instead of the unknown state.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89103

Unknown input bit treated as a missing transition · case 03

An 'x' input leaves the machine in a definite state instead of the unknown state.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89104

Unknown input bit treated as a missing transition · case 04

An 'x' input leaves the machine in a definite state instead of the unknown state.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89105

Unknown input bit treated as a missing transition · case 05

An 'x' input leaves the machine in a definite state instead of the unknown state.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89106

Unknown state outputs a definite zero · case 01

While the state register is unknown the output reads 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89107

Unknown state outputs a definite zero · case 02

While the state register is unknown the output reads 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89108

Unknown state outputs a definite zero · case 03

While the state register is unknown the output reads 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89109

Unknown state outputs a definite zero · case 04

While the state register is unknown the output reads 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89110

Unknown state outputs a definite zero · case 05

While the state register is unknown the output reads 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89111

Byte enable bits mapped to the wrong lanes · case 01

Writing with only the low-byte enable modifies the high byte.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89112

Byte enable bits mapped to the wrong lanes · case 02

Writing with only the low-byte enable modifies the high byte.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89113

Byte enable bits mapped to the wrong lanes · case 03

Writing with only the low-byte enable modifies the high byte.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89114

Byte enable bits mapped to the wrong lanes · case 04

Writing with only the low-byte enable modifies the high byte.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89115

Byte enable bits mapped to the wrong lanes · case 05

Writing with only the low-byte enable modifies the high byte.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89116

Write-first RAM returns stale data · case 01

In write-first mode a read in the same cycle as a write returns the previous word.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89117

Write-first RAM returns stale data · case 02

In write-first mode a read in the same cycle as a write returns the previous word.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89118

Write-first RAM returns stale data · case 03

In write-first mode a read in the same cycle as a write returns the previous word.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89119

Write-first RAM returns stale data · case 04

In write-first mode a read in the same cycle as a write returns the previous word.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89120

Write-first RAM returns stale data · case 05

In write-first mode a read in the same cycle as a write returns the previous word.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89121

Any byte enable writes the whole word · case 01

A single-lane write clobbers the other byte lane.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89122

Any byte enable writes the whole word · case 02

A single-lane write clobbers the other byte lane.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89123

Any byte enable writes the whole word · case 03

A single-lane write clobbers the other byte lane.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89124

Any byte enable writes the whole word · case 04

A single-lane write clobbers the other byte lane.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89125

Any byte enable writes the whole word · case 05

A single-lane write clobbers the other byte lane.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89126

Negative address wraps to the top of memory · case 01

A write to address -1 lands in the last word.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89127

Negative address wraps to the top of memory · case 02

A write to address -1 lands in the last word.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89128

Negative address wraps to the top of memory · case 03

A write to address -1 lands in the last word.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89129

Negative address wraps to the top of memory · case 04

A write to address -1 lands in the last word.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89130

Negative address wraps to the top of memory · case 05

A write to address -1 lands in the last word.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89131

Out-of-range read returns zero · case 01

Reading past the end of the memory yields 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89132

Out-of-range read returns zero · case 02

Reading past the end of the memory yields 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89133

Out-of-range read returns zero · case 03

Reading past the end of the memory yields 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89134

Out-of-range read returns zero · case 04

Reading past the end of the memory yields 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89135

Out-of-range read returns zero · case 05

Reading past the end of the memory yields 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89136

Unchanged samples written as value changes · case 01

The dump repeats values that did not change, with extra timestamp markers.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89137

Unchanged samples written as value changes · case 02

The dump repeats values that did not change, with extra timestamp markers.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89138

Unchanged samples written as value changes · case 03

The dump repeats values that did not change, with extra timestamp markers.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89139

Unchanged samples written as value changes · case 04

The dump repeats values that did not change, with extra timestamp markers.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89140

Unchanged samples written as value changes · case 05

The dump repeats values that did not change, with extra timestamp markers.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89141

Timestamp written for a time with only redundant samples · case 01

A '#t' marker appears for a time at which nothing changed.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89142

Timestamp written for a time with only redundant samples · case 02

A '#t' marker appears for a time at which nothing changed.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89143

Timestamp written for a time with only redundant samples · case 03

A '#t' marker appears for a time at which nothing changed.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89144

Timestamp written for a time with only redundant samples · case 04

A '#t' marker appears for a time at which nothing changed.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89145

Timestamp written for a time with only redundant samples · case 05

A '#t' marker appears for a time at which nothing changed.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89146

All-zero vector written with no digits · case 01

A vector returning to zero is dumped as 'b <id>' with an empty value.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89147

All-zero vector written with no digits · case 02

A vector returning to zero is dumped as 'b <id>' with an empty value.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89148

All-zero vector written with no digits · case 03

A vector returning to zero is dumped as 'b <id>' with an empty value.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89149

All-zero vector written with no digits · case 04

A vector returning to zero is dumped as 'b <id>' with an empty value.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89150

All-zero vector written with no digits · case 05

A vector returning to zero is dumped as 'b <id>' with an empty value.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89151

Short vector value printed as a scalar change · case 01

A vector sample given as a single digit is dumped in scalar form without the b prefix.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89152

Short vector value printed as a scalar change · case 02

A vector sample given as a single digit is dumped in scalar form without the b prefix.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89153

Short vector value printed as a scalar change · case 03

A vector sample given as a single digit is dumped in scalar form without the b prefix.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89154

Short vector value printed as a scalar change · case 04

A vector sample given as a single digit is dumped in scalar form without the b prefix.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89155

Short vector value printed as a scalar change · case 05

A vector sample given as a single digit is dumped in scalar form without the b prefix.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89156

Leading unknown run not collapsed · case 01

An all-unknown vector is dumped as 'bxxx' instead of 'bx'.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89157

Leading unknown run not collapsed · case 02

An all-unknown vector is dumped as 'bxxx' instead of 'bx'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89158

Leading unknown run not collapsed · case 03

An all-unknown vector is dumped as 'bxxx' instead of 'bx'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89159

Leading unknown run not collapsed · case 04

An all-unknown vector is dumped as 'bxxx' instead of 'bx'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89160

Leading unknown run not collapsed · case 05

An all-unknown vector is dumped as 'bxxx' instead of 'bx'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89161

Term positions read least-significant first · case 01

Hazard pairs are reported on mirrored minterm numbers.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89162

Term positions read least-significant first · case 02

Hazard pairs are reported on mirrored minterm numbers.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89163

Term positions read least-significant first · case 03

Hazard pairs are reported on mirrored minterm numbers.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89164

Term positions read least-significant first · case 04

Hazard pairs are reported on mirrored minterm numbers.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89165

Term positions read least-significant first · case 05

Hazard pairs are reported on mirrored minterm numbers.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89166

Complemented literals ignored in term coverage · case 01

Terms with a 0 literal cover minterms where that variable is 1.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89167

Complemented literals ignored in term coverage · case 02

Terms with a 0 literal cover minterms where that variable is 1.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89168

Complemented literals ignored in term coverage · case 03

Terms with a 0 literal cover minterms where that variable is 1.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89169

Complemented literals ignored in term coverage · case 04

Terms with a 0 literal cover minterms where that variable is 1.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89170

Complemented literals ignored in term coverage · case 05

Terms with a 0 literal cover minterms where that variable is 1.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89171

Hazard pair reported twice · case 01

Each hazard appears as both [a, b] and [b, a].

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89172

Hazard pair reported twice · case 02

Each hazard appears as both [a, b] and [b, a].

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89173

Hazard pair reported twice · case 03

Each hazard appears as both [a, b] and [b, a].

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89174

Hazard pair reported twice · case 04

Each hazard appears as both [a, b] and [b, a].

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89175

Hazard pair reported twice · case 05

Each hazard appears as both [a, b] and [b, a].

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89176

Hazard judged by first covering term only · case 01

Adjacent minterms sharing a consensus term are still reported as hazards.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89177

Hazard judged by first covering term only · case 02

Adjacent minterms sharing a consensus term are still reported as hazards.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89178

Hazard judged by first covering term only · case 03

Adjacent minterms sharing a consensus term are still reported as hazards.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89179

Hazard judged by first covering term only · case 04

Adjacent minterms sharing a consensus term are still reported as hazards.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89180

Hazard judged by first covering term only · case 05

Adjacent minterms sharing a consensus term are still reported as hazards.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89181

Neighbour generation flips the wrong bits · case 01

Pairs that differ in more than one variable are tested and real one-bit neighbours are skipped.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89182

Neighbour generation flips the wrong bits · case 02

Pairs that differ in more than one variable are tested and real one-bit neighbours are skipped.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89183

Neighbour generation flips the wrong bits · case 03

Pairs that differ in more than one variable are tested and real one-bit neighbours are skipped.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89184

Neighbour generation flips the wrong bits · case 04

Pairs that differ in more than one variable are tested and real one-bit neighbours are skipped.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89185

Neighbour generation flips the wrong bits · case 05

Pairs that differ in more than one variable are tested and real one-bit neighbours are skipped.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89186

JK flip-flop holds instead of toggling · case 01

J=K=1 leaves the output unchanged.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89187

JK flip-flop holds instead of toggling · case 02

J=K=1 leaves the output unchanged.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89188

JK flip-flop holds instead of toggling · case 03

J=K=1 leaves the output unchanged.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89189

JK flip-flop holds instead of toggling · case 04

J=K=1 leaves the output unchanged.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89190

JK flip-flop holds instead of toggling · case 05

J=K=1 leaves the output unchanged.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89191

J and K inputs swapped · case 01

Asserting J clears the flop and asserting K sets it.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89192

J and K inputs swapped · case 02

Asserting J clears the flop and asserting K sets it.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89193

J and K inputs swapped · case 03

Asserting J clears the flop and asserting K sets it.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89194

J and K inputs swapped · case 04

Asserting J clears the flop and asserting K sets it.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89195

J and K inputs swapped · case 05

Asserting J clears the flop and asserting K sets it.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89196

Forbidden SR input resolved as reset · case 01

S=R=1 produces a definite 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation● Open access↗
FA-89197

Forbidden SR input resolved as reset · case 02

S=R=1 produces a definite 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89198

Forbidden SR input resolved as reset · case 03

S=R=1 produces a definite 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89199

Forbidden SR input resolved as reset · case 04

S=R=1 produces a definite 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗
FA-89200

Forbidden SR input resolved as reset · case 05

S=R=1 produces a definite 0 instead of 'x'.

Digital logic simulation◈ Members↗

INSPECTABLE BY DESIGN

Every result has a runnable source.

Runnable implementations with recorded outputs, source hashes, and explicit contracts. Related variants share a failure mechanism and belong together in evaluation splits.

Read the methodology ↗