FAILURE MAP

Understand the failure.
Verify the repair.

Small, reproducible software failures. The broken implementation, the fix that didn’t work, and the one that passed—preserved together.

Explore the cases ↓How results are verified ↗
100840Executable case variants
20168Distinct failure mechanisms
302520Executed implementations
20168Open-access cases

WHAT THE ARCHIVE CONTAINS

100840 executable cases. 20168 are open.

Every case records the implementation that fails, the fix that did not work, and the repair that passed its checks—with recorded outputs and source hashes. This release adds 100840 cases across 20168 failure mechanisms and 254 domains.

The open tier gives you the failure and the unsuccessful fix for one case in every mechanism. The remaining 80672 cases, 5 variants per mechanism, are member-only: the verified repair, its recorded checks, and the full fixture suite are held in the member archive. Read the methodology ↗

A RECORD OF WHAT WENT WRONG

Browse the archive / 100840

Python · Standard library
REFERENCEFAILURE MECHANISMDOMAINACCESS
FA-18001

Exchange delay normalization hides physically impossible negative propagation · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for round_trip.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18002

Exchange delay normalization hides physically impossible negative propagation · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for round_trip.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18003

Exchange delay normalization hides physically impossible negative propagation · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for round_trip.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18004

Exchange delay normalization hides physically impossible negative propagation · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for round_trip.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18005

Exchange delay normalization hides physically impossible negative propagation · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for round_trip.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18006

Earliest offset bound uses receive rather than server-send causality · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_low.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18007

Earliest offset bound uses receive rather than server-send causality · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_low.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18008

Earliest offset bound uses receive rather than server-send causality · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_low.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18009

Earliest offset bound uses receive rather than server-send causality · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_low.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18010

Earliest offset bound uses receive rather than server-send causality · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_low.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18011

Latest offset bound uses send rather than server-receive causality · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_high.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18012

Latest offset bound uses send rather than server-receive causality · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_high.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18013

Latest offset bound uses send rather than server-receive causality · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_high.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18014

Latest offset bound uses send rather than server-receive causality · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_high.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18015

Latest offset bound uses send rather than server-receive causality · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset_high.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18016

Clock offset estimator uses interval radius or discards half tick · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18017

Clock offset estimator uses interval radius or discards half tick · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18018

Clock offset estimator uses interval radius or discards half tick · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18019

Clock offset estimator uses interval radius or discards half tick · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18020

Clock offset estimator uses interval radius or discards half tick · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for offset.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18021

Server-time projection uses reversed offset or stale exchange instant · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for projected.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18022

Server-time projection uses reversed offset or stale exchange instant · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for projected.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18023

Server-time projection uses reversed offset or stale exchange instant · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for projected.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18024

Server-time projection uses reversed offset or stale exchange instant · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for projected.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18025

Server-time projection uses reversed offset or stale exchange instant · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for projected.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18026

One-way propagation estimate includes service delay or truncates odd tick · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for one_way.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18027

One-way propagation estimate includes service delay or truncates odd tick · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for one_way.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18028

One-way propagation estimate includes service delay or truncates odd tick · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for one_way.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18029

One-way propagation estimate includes service delay or truncates odd tick · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for one_way.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18030

One-way propagation estimate includes service delay or truncates odd tick · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for one_way.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18031

Exchange validity admits impossible negative propagation or rejects zero delay · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for valid.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18032

Exchange validity admits impossible negative propagation or rejects zero delay · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for valid.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18033

Exchange validity admits impossible negative propagation or rejects zero delay · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for valid.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18034

Exchange validity admits impossible negative propagation or rejects zero delay · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for valid.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18035

Exchange validity admits impossible negative propagation or rejects zero delay · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for valid.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18036

Clock error radius is confused with offset center or full round trip · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for uncertainty.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18037

Clock error radius is confused with offset center or full round trip · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for uncertainty.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18038

Clock error radius is confused with offset center or full round trip · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for uncertainty.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18039

Clock error radius is confused with offset center or full round trip · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for uncertainty.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18040

Clock error radius is confused with offset center or full round trip · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for uncertainty.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18041

Hybrid receive drops remote or local physical history · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for physical.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18042

Hybrid receive drops remote or local physical history · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for physical.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18043

Hybrid receive drops remote or local physical history · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for physical.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18044

Hybrid receive drops remote or local physical history · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for physical.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18045

Hybrid receive drops remote or local physical history · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for physical.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18046

Logical ownership treats older local physical state as current · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for local_owns.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18047

Logical ownership treats older local physical state as current · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for local_owns.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18048

Logical ownership treats older local physical state as current · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for local_owns.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18049

Logical ownership treats older local physical state as current · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for local_owns.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18050

Logical ownership treats older local physical state as current · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for local_owns.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18051

Remote logical ownership ignores exact physical equality · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for remote_owns.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18052

Remote logical ownership ignores exact physical equality · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for remote_owns.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18053

Remote logical ownership ignores exact physical equality · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for remote_owns.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18054

Remote logical ownership ignores exact physical equality · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for remote_owns.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18055

Remote logical ownership ignores exact physical equality · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for remote_owns.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18056

Hybrid receive increments logical counter when wall alone advanced · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for logical.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18057

Hybrid receive increments logical counter when wall alone advanced · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for logical.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18058

Hybrid receive increments logical counter when wall alone advanced · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for logical.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18059

Hybrid receive increments logical counter when wall alone advanced · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for logical.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18060

Hybrid receive increments logical counter when wall alone advanced · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for logical.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18061

Hybrid logical carry uses the largest label rather than counter capacity · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for carry.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18062

Hybrid logical carry uses the largest label rather than counter capacity · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for carry.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18063

Hybrid logical carry uses the largest label rather than counter capacity · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for carry.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18064

Hybrid logical carry uses the largest label rather than counter capacity · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for carry.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18065

Hybrid logical carry uses the largest label rather than counter capacity · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for carry.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18066

Hybrid counter carry is dropped or adds all logical ticks to physical time · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_p.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18067

Hybrid counter carry is dropped or adds all logical ticks to physical time · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_p.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18068

Hybrid counter carry is dropped or adds all logical ticks to physical time · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_p.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18069

Hybrid counter carry is dropped or adds all logical ticks to physical time · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_p.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18070

Hybrid counter carry is dropped or adds all logical ticks to physical time · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_p.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18071

Hybrid logical component overflows or saturates instead of carrying · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_l.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18072

Hybrid logical component overflows or saturates instead of carrying · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_l.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18073

Hybrid logical component overflows or saturates instead of carrying · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_l.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18074

Hybrid logical component overflows or saturates instead of carrying · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_l.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18075

Hybrid logical component overflows or saturates instead of carrying · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for normalized_l.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18076

Clock-source provenance collapses source bits or omits wall source · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for mask.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18077

Clock-source provenance collapses source bits or omits wall source · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for mask.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18078

Clock-source provenance collapses source bits or omits wall source · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for mask.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18079

Clock-source provenance collapses source bits or omits wall source · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for mask.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18080

Clock-source provenance collapses source bits or omits wall source · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for mask.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18081

Local hybrid ordering compares only one timestamp component · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_local.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18082

Local hybrid ordering compares only one timestamp component · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_local.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18083

Local hybrid ordering compares only one timestamp component · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_local.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18084

Local hybrid ordering compares only one timestamp component · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_local.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18085

Local hybrid ordering compares only one timestamp component · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_local.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18086

Remote hybrid ordering discards lexicographic physical precedence · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_remote.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18087

Remote hybrid ordering discards lexicographic physical precedence · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_remote.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18088

Remote hybrid ordering discards lexicographic physical precedence · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_remote.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18089

Remote hybrid ordering discards lexicographic physical precedence · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_remote.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18090

Remote hybrid ordering discards lexicographic physical precedence · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for after_remote.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18091

Clock bridge reuses calibration from a different boot · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for boot_ok.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18092

Clock bridge reuses calibration from a different boot · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for boot_ok.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18093

Clock bridge reuses calibration from a different boot · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for boot_ok.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18094

Clock bridge reuses calibration from a different boot · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for boot_ok.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18095

Clock bridge reuses calibration from a different boot · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for boot_ok.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18096

Clock bridge applies calibration from another rate generation · case 01

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for generation_ok.

Time representation● Open access↗
FA-18097

Clock bridge applies calibration from another rate generation · case 02

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for generation_ok.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18098

Clock bridge applies calibration from another rate generation · case 03

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for generation_ok.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18099

Clock bridge applies calibration from another rate generation · case 04

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for generation_ok.

Time representation◈ Members↗
FA-18100

Clock bridge applies calibration from another rate generation · case 05

The decoded time state disagrees with the explicit regression oracle for generation_ok.

Time representation◈ Members↗

INSPECTABLE BY DESIGN

Every result has a runnable source.

Runnable implementations with recorded outputs, source hashes, and explicit contracts. Related variants share a failure mechanism and belong together in evaluation splits.

Read the methodology ↗