FAILURE MAP

Understand the failure.
Verify the repair.

Small, reproducible software failures. The broken implementation, the fix that didn’t work, and the one that passed—preserved together.

Explore the cases ↓How results are verified ↗
100840Executable case variants
20168Distinct failure mechanisms
302520Executed implementations
20168Open-access cases

WHAT THE ARCHIVE CONTAINS

100840 executable cases. 20168 are open.

Every case records the implementation that fails, the fix that did not work, and the repair that passed its checks—with recorded outputs and source hashes. This release adds 100840 cases across 20168 failure mechanisms and 254 domains.

The open tier gives you the failure and the unsuccessful fix for one case in every mechanism. The remaining 80672 cases, 5 variants per mechanism, are member-only: the verified repair, its recorded checks, and the full fixture suite are held in the member archive. Read the methodology ↗

A RECORD OF WHAT WENT WRONG

Browse the archive / 100840

Python · Standard library
REFERENCEFAILURE MECHANISMDOMAINACCESS
FA-15401

Rational nullspace basis: free coordinate normalization · case 01

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at free coordinate normalization.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15402

Rational nullspace basis: free coordinate normalization · case 02

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at free coordinate normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15403

Rational nullspace basis: free coordinate normalization · case 03

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at free coordinate normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15404

Rational nullspace basis: free coordinate normalization · case 04

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at free coordinate normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15405

Rational nullspace basis: free coordinate normalization · case 05

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at free coordinate normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15406

Rational nullspace basis: pivot coordinate placement · case 01

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot coordinate placement.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15407

Rational nullspace basis: pivot coordinate placement · case 02

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot coordinate placement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15408

Rational nullspace basis: pivot coordinate placement · case 03

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot coordinate placement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15409

Rational nullspace basis: pivot coordinate placement · case 04

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot coordinate placement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15410

Rational nullspace basis: pivot coordinate placement · case 05

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot coordinate placement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15411

Rational nullspace basis: pivot equation rearrangement · case 01

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot equation rearrangement.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15412

Rational nullspace basis: pivot equation rearrangement · case 02

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot equation rearrangement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15413

Rational nullspace basis: pivot equation rearrangement · case 03

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot equation rearrangement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15414

Rational nullspace basis: pivot equation rearrangement · case 04

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot equation rearrangement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15415

Rational nullspace basis: pivot equation rearrangement · case 05

The exact rational nullspace basis result violates the stated contract at pivot equation rearrangement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15416

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial upper normalization · case 01

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial upper normalization.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15417

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial upper normalization · case 02

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial upper normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15418

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial upper normalization · case 03

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial upper normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15419

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial upper normalization · case 04

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial upper normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15420

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial upper normalization · case 05

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial upper normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15421

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial rhs normalization · case 01

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial rhs normalization.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15422

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial rhs normalization · case 02

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial rhs normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15423

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial rhs normalization · case 03

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial rhs normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15424

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial rhs normalization · case 04

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial rhs normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15425

Exact tridiagonal solve: initial rhs normalization · case 05

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at initial rhs normalization.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15426

Exact tridiagonal solve: schur diagonal update · case 01

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at schur diagonal update.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15427

Exact tridiagonal solve: schur diagonal update · case 02

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at schur diagonal update.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15428

Exact tridiagonal solve: schur diagonal update · case 03

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at schur diagonal update.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15429

Exact tridiagonal solve: schur diagonal update · case 04

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at schur diagonal update.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15430

Exact tridiagonal solve: schur diagonal update · case 05

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at schur diagonal update.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15431

Exact tridiagonal solve: forward rhs elimination · case 01

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at forward rhs elimination.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15432

Exact tridiagonal solve: forward rhs elimination · case 02

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at forward rhs elimination.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15433

Exact tridiagonal solve: forward rhs elimination · case 03

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at forward rhs elimination.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15434

Exact tridiagonal solve: forward rhs elimination · case 04

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at forward rhs elimination.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15435

Exact tridiagonal solve: forward rhs elimination · case 05

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at forward rhs elimination.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15436

Exact tridiagonal solve: back substitution · case 01

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at back substitution.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15437

Exact tridiagonal solve: back substitution · case 02

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at back substitution.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15438

Exact tridiagonal solve: back substitution · case 03

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at back substitution.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15439

Exact tridiagonal solve: back substitution · case 04

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at back substitution.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15440

Exact tridiagonal solve: back substitution · case 05

The exact exact tridiagonal solve result violates the stated contract at back substitution.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15441

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal factor progression · case 01

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal factor progression.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15442

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal factor progression · case 02

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal factor progression.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15443

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal factor progression · case 03

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal factor progression.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15444

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal factor progression · case 04

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal factor progression.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15445

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal factor progression · case 05

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal factor progression.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15446

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal schur complement · case 01

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal schur complement.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15447

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal schur complement · case 02

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal schur complement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15448

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal schur complement · case 03

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal schur complement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15449

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal schur complement · case 04

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal schur complement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15450

Exact ldl decomposition: diagonal schur complement · case 05

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at diagonal schur complement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15451

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor row coverage · case 01

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor row coverage.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15452

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor row coverage · case 02

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor row coverage.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15453

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor row coverage · case 03

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor row coverage.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15454

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor row coverage · case 04

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor row coverage.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15455

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor row coverage · case 05

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor row coverage.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15456

Exact ldl decomposition: off diagonal schur complement · case 01

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at off diagonal schur complement.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15457

Exact ldl decomposition: off diagonal schur complement · case 02

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at off diagonal schur complement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15458

Exact ldl decomposition: off diagonal schur complement · case 03

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at off diagonal schur complement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15459

Exact ldl decomposition: off diagonal schur complement · case 04

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at off diagonal schur complement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15460

Exact ldl decomposition: off diagonal schur complement · case 05

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at off diagonal schur complement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15461

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor diagonal divisor · case 01

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor diagonal divisor.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15462

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor diagonal divisor · case 02

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor diagonal divisor.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15463

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor diagonal divisor · case 03

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor diagonal divisor.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15464

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor diagonal divisor · case 04

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor diagonal divisor.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15465

Exact ldl decomposition: lower factor diagonal divisor · case 05

The exact exact ldl decomposition result violates the stated contract at lower factor diagonal divisor.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15466

Integer matrix binary power: multiplicative identity seed · case 01

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at multiplicative identity seed.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15467

Integer matrix binary power: multiplicative identity seed · case 02

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at multiplicative identity seed.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15468

Integer matrix binary power: multiplicative identity seed · case 03

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at multiplicative identity seed.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15469

Integer matrix binary power: multiplicative identity seed · case 04

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at multiplicative identity seed.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15470

Integer matrix binary power: multiplicative identity seed · case 05

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at multiplicative identity seed.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15471

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent digit test · case 01

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent digit test.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15472

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent digit test · case 02

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent digit test.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15473

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent digit test · case 03

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent digit test.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15474

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent digit test · case 04

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent digit test.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15475

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent digit test · case 05

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent digit test.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15476

Integer matrix binary power: selected power accumulation · case 01

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at selected power accumulation.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15477

Integer matrix binary power: selected power accumulation · case 02

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at selected power accumulation.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15478

Integer matrix binary power: selected power accumulation · case 03

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at selected power accumulation.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15479

Integer matrix binary power: selected power accumulation · case 04

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at selected power accumulation.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15480

Integer matrix binary power: selected power accumulation · case 05

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at selected power accumulation.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15481

Integer matrix binary power: base power squaring · case 01

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at base power squaring.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15482

Integer matrix binary power: base power squaring · case 02

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at base power squaring.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15483

Integer matrix binary power: base power squaring · case 03

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at base power squaring.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15484

Integer matrix binary power: base power squaring · case 04

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at base power squaring.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15485

Integer matrix binary power: base power squaring · case 05

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at base power squaring.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15486

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent advancement · case 01

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent advancement.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15487

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent advancement · case 02

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent advancement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15488

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent advancement · case 03

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent advancement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15489

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent advancement · case 04

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent advancement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15490

Integer matrix binary power: binary exponent advancement · case 05

The exact integer matrix binary power result violates the stated contract at binary exponent advancement.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15491

Hensel simple root lift: lifting exponent count · case 01

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at lifting exponent count.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15492

Hensel simple root lift: lifting exponent count · case 02

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at lifting exponent count.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15493

Hensel simple root lift: lifting exponent count · case 03

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at lifting exponent count.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15494

Hensel simple root lift: lifting exponent count · case 04

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at lifting exponent count.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15495

Hensel simple root lift: lifting exponent count · case 05

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at lifting exponent count.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15496

Hensel simple root lift: formal derivative evaluation · case 01

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at formal derivative evaluation.

Numerics● Open access↗
FA-15497

Hensel simple root lift: formal derivative evaluation · case 02

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at formal derivative evaluation.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15498

Hensel simple root lift: formal derivative evaluation · case 03

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at formal derivative evaluation.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15499

Hensel simple root lift: formal derivative evaluation · case 04

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at formal derivative evaluation.

Numerics◈ Members↗
FA-15500

Hensel simple root lift: formal derivative evaluation · case 05

The exact hensel simple root lift result violates the stated contract at formal derivative evaluation.

Numerics◈ Members↗

INSPECTABLE BY DESIGN

Every result has a runnable source.

Runnable implementations with recorded outputs, source hashes, and explicit contracts. Related variants share a failure mechanism and belong together in evaluation splits.

Read the methodology ↗