FA-99161 / Checkpoint tensor mapping / Open access
Checkpoint mapping: missing shard indices are not detected · case 01
missing shard indices are not detected.
ROOT CAUSE
Matching shard count does not prove that every required index appears once.
THE FAILURE
Matching shard count does not prove that every required index appears once.
Unsuccessful approach: Length-only validation accepts duplicate indices while omitting another shard.
Case contract
Return values in shard order only when indices are exactly 0 through count-1; otherwise return [] (also for count zero).
Why this case matters
A bounded offline model of checkpoint tensor bookkeeping in a training workflow.
1 / The failure
Exit 1"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
N = 1
observations = []
def solve(shards, count):
return sum((v for i,v in sorted(shards)), [])
def check(label, actual, expected):
observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('gap', solve(*([[0, [3]], [2, [2]]], 3)), [])
check('complete', solve(*([[1, [1]], [0, [0]]], 2)), [0, 1])
check('empty zero', solve(*([], 0)), [])
check('unexpected', solve(*([[0, [3]]], 0)), [])
check('duplicate', solve(*([[0, [1]], [0, [2]]], 2)), [])
check('single', solve(*([[0, [3]]], 1)), [3])
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
| Boundary fixture | Actual | Expected | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| gap | [3, 2] | [] | Failed |
| complete | [0, 1] | [0, 1] | Passed |
| empty zero | [] | [] | Passed |
| unexpected | [3] | [] | Failed |
| duplicate | [1, 2] | [] | Failed |
| single | [3] | [3] | Passed |
SHA-256 / 0cc34992cc4d533676c753a4cb03b81a822c343ab6d6aa32e50b4614f8d0b239
2 / The unsuccessful fix
Exit 1"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
N = 1
observations = []
def solve(shards, count):
return sum((v for i,v in sorted(shards)), []) if len(shards)==count else []
def check(label, actual, expected):
observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('gap', solve(*([[0, [3]], [2, [2]]], 3)), [])
check('complete', solve(*([[1, [1]], [0, [0]]], 2)), [0, 1])
check('empty zero', solve(*([], 0)), [])
check('unexpected', solve(*([[0, [3]]], 0)), [])
check('duplicate', solve(*([[0, [1]], [0, [2]]], 2)), [])
check('single', solve(*([[0, [3]]], 1)), [3])
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
| Boundary fixture | Actual | Expected | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| gap | [] | [] | Passed |
| complete | [0, 1] | [0, 1] | Passed |
| empty zero | [] | [] | Passed |
| unexpected | [] | [] | Passed |
| duplicate | [1, 2] | [] | Failed |
| single | [3] | [3] | Passed |
SHA-256 / 2090ce9847154d48269d9cb2e50cff0f576107dfd5cbe82a6d6a5054e9eb3e32
HELD IN THE MEMBER ARCHIVE
The verified repair and its recorded checks are member-only.
This mechanism has 6 recorded checks per implementation. The open-access tier publishes the failure and the unsuccessful fix; the repaired source that passes every check, and the observations that prove it, are available to members.
Every case sharing this mechanism uses the same contract and the same repair, so this one record is held back for all of them.
Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the repair.
Sign in to the archive ↗Verification & scope
Inputs are already decoded Python values; this toy contract makes no claim about a framework, file format, or production checkpoint. This reproducer isolates one failure mechanism. Results cover the supplied fixtures. Variants within a family share a test contract and should remain grouped when constructing evaluation splits. Related mechanisms with a shared evaluation_group must also remain together; these controlled models are not independent production incidents.
Observations recorded using Python 3.12.14 at 2026-09-30T16:48:21.244187+00:00.
Case digest / 0e8b49a8109a53ce3c341c05723dc7d4ecad44fd77121f050aeeb9d8c1724f34