FA-95030 / Warehouse slotting and bin packing / Member archive

Hazmat audit: bays compared across aisles · case 05

Products in different aisles with the same bay number are reported as too close.

Member previewVariant 5 · 3 implementations · 8 checks per implementation

Case contract

placements [[sku, hazard class, aisle, bay]]; rules [[class_a, class_b, min_bay_gap]] apply in either order within the same aisle. A rule class matches a hazard class equal to it or a division of it ("4" matches "4.1"). A pair violates when |bay difference| < min_gap. Different SKUs only. Return sorted unique [sku_low, sku_high] pairs.

Why this case matters

Dangerous goods storage requires separation between incompatible hazard classes.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
generated mix 16	`[["H0", "H2"], ["H1", "H5"], ["H2", "H3"], ["H2", "H4"]]`	`[["H0", "H2"], ["H2", "H3"], ["H2", "H4"]]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.