FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-94363 / Exam timetabling constraints / Member archive

Clash report ordered by period instead of student · case 03

Student letters list clashes in a different order than the contract.

Member previewVariant 3 · 3 implementations · 8 checks per implementation

Case contract

enrol rows [student, exam] (may repeat), period maps scheduled exams to a period, xlist groups cross-listed exams that are one physical paper (canonical name = smallest id in the group). A clash is a student with two or more distinct canonical papers in one period; unscheduled exams are ignored. Return [student, period, sorted papers] ordered by student then period.

Why this case matters

Clash detection is the primary hard constraint of exam timetabling; duplicate enrolments and cross-listing are the usual sources of false clashes.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
regression: report order 1[["s3", 0, ["HIST140", "MATH101"]], ["s5", 0, ["BIO130", "MATH101"]], ["s3", 3, ["ECON150", "MATH101"]]][["s3", 0, ["HIST140", "MATH101"]], ["s3", 3, ["ECON150", "MATH101"]], ["s5", 0, ["BIO130", "MATH101"]]]Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.

Sign in to the archive ↗