FA-93842 / Shift rostering labor rules / Member archive

Rest validation walks shifts in submission order · case 02

Rosters entered out of chronological order report spurious overlaps and miss real short rests.

Member previewVariant 2 · 3 implementations · 8 checks per implementation

Case contract

Input shifts as [worker, start, end] absolute minutes and a minimum rest "HH:MM". For each worker, walk shifts by start time, comparing each start with the latest end seen so far (and that shift index): a negative gap is an overlap, a gap below the minimum rest is short_rest; exactly the minimum is compliant. Return [worker, earlier index, later index, kind] rows ordered by worker then start.

Why this case matters

Rest-period validation is the most common roster labor rule; errors either hide fatigue risks or block legal rosters.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
regression: submission order walk 1	`[["ana", 0, 1, "overlap"], ["ana", 0, 2, "overlap"]]`	`[]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.