FA-91762 / Digital signal filters / Member archive

DC blocker subtracts the feedback term · case 02

The pole sits at -R, producing an alternating tail instead of a slow decay.

Member previewVariant 2 · 3 implementations · 7 checks per implementation

Case contract

Input [R, samples]: y[n] = x[n] - x[n-1] + R y[n-1] with 0 <= R < 1 ("bad-pole"), warm-started so x[-1] = x[0] and y[-1] = 0 (no start-up step). Return exact fraction strings.

Why this case matters

DC blockers remove offsets before further processing; a cold start injects a large transient.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
regression: random dc blocker 3	`["0", "3", "-97/10", "873/100", "143/1000", "-71287/10000"]`	`["0", "3", "-43/10", "-387/100", "4517/1000", "-29347/10000"]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.