FA-87123 / Physics integrator stability / Member archive

Backward Euler numerator applies the spring force with the wrong sign · case 03

The implicit solve pushes the mass away from rest.

Member previewVariant 3 · 3 implementations · 8 checks per implementation

Case contract

solve(x0, v0, k, m, c, dt, steps): backward Euler for x'=v, m v'=-k x-c v in closed form v1=(v-dt*k*x/m)/(1+dt*c/m+dt^2*k/m), x1=x+dt*v1. Energy E=0.5 m v^2+0.5 k x^2; report the peak E_n/E_0 including step 0 (0 when E_0=0). Return [x, v, peak] rounded to 6.

Why this case matters

Game and robotics physics loops depend on integrator update order, step control and stabilization terms; a wrong decision point turns a stable simulation into drifting or exploding motion.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
case 0	`[-0.489863, 0.609175, 1.0]`	`[-0.478281, 1.378125, 1.0]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.