FA-79298 / Image orientation metadata / Member archive

Canonical key compares pixels without the shape · case 03

A 2x3 image and its 3x2 rotation compare by raw pixel order, so different aspect ratios canonicalise inconsistently.

Member previewVariant 3 · 3 implementations · 8 checks per implementation

Case contract

For duplicate detection, bring a pixel grid into a canonical orientation: of the eight orientations (tags 1..8, same pixel mapping as EXIF baking), pick the one whose key (height, width, row-major pixels) is smallest; ties go to the lowest tag. Return [tag, inverse_tag, canonical_grid] where the inverse tag restores the original (6 and 8 are mutual inverses, every other tag is self-inverse).

Why this case matters

Camera, phone and scanner images carry an orientation hint separately from the stored pixels; galleries, thumbnailers, editors and upload pipelines must interpret it consistently or photos appear sideways, mirrored or doubly rotated.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
regression: shape in comparison key 0	`[3, 3, [[4], [5]]]`	`[6, 8, [[4, 5]]]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.