FA-79020 / Image orientation metadata / Member archive

Out-of-range EXIF orientation overrides XMP · case 05

An EXIF value of 0 or 9 is passed to the renderer even though a valid XMP orientation exists.

Member previewVariant 5 · 3 implementations · 8 checks per implementation

Case contract

Resolve the displayed orientation tag from metadata sources. For HEIF, the container transforms are authoritative and EXIF/XMP are ignored: irot is anticlockwise quarter turns (default 0) applied first, then imir mirrors about the vertical axis (0, left-right) or the horizontal axis (1, top-bottom); the result is mapped to a tag through (k clockwise quarter turns after m mirrors) = {(0,0):1, (0,1):2, (2,0):3, (2,1):4, (3,1):5, (1,0):6, (1,1):7, (3,0):8}. For other containers a valid integer EXIF value 1..8 wins; otherwise an XMP string that is a single digit 1..8 after trimming whitespace; otherwise 1.

Why this case matters

Camera, phone and scanner images carry an orientation hint separately from the stored pixels; galleries, thumbnailers, editors and upload pipelines must interpret it consistently or photos appear sideways, mirrored or doubly rotated.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
regression: EXIF value validation 0	`9`	`1`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.