FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-7167 / Network routing / Member archive

Route priority is secondary to match specificity · case 02

Route priority is secondary to match specificity.

Member previewVariant 2 · 3 implementations · 4 checks per implementation

Case contract

Bounded offline decision model: route priority is secondary to match specificity. Inputs are already validated protocol fields; the explicit fixtures define the supported policy, not a complete protocol implementation.

Why this case matters

This deterministic network routing model isolates the route-priority-is-secondary-to-match-specificity policy at a network component boundary.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
fixture 1"b""a"Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.

Sign in to the archive ↗