FA-69802 / Orbital propagation / Member archive

Co-orbital phasing manoeuvre: The lead angle is not split across phasing revolutions · case 02

Multi-revolution phasing orbits are far too eccentric.

Member previewVariant 2 · 3 implementations · 7 checks per implementation

Case contract

Input [r, theta, k, mu, rmin]: circular radius, target lead angle in degrees (positive = target ahead), k phasing revolutions. Phasing period Tph=T-theta_rad/(k n). a_ph from Tph; total dv = 2|v_ph(r)-v_circ| with vis-viva at r. Return None if the phasing perigee 2a_ph-r is below rmin, else [a_ph rounded 3, dv rounded 6, k*Tph rounded 3].

Why this case matters

Orbit determination and mission planning chain many small conversions; one wrong branch or unit silently moves a spacecraft by kilometres.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
co-orbital phasing manoeuvre [6778.0, -30.0, 2, 398600.4418, 6478.0]	`[7149.51, 0.393439, 12032.488]`	`[6964.994, 0.204521, 11569.7]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.