FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-6761 / HTTP caching / Open access

Revalidation 304 merges present fields and retains absent fields · case 01

Revalidation 304 merges present fields and retains absent fields.

Verified by executionVariant 1 · 4 checks per implementationDownload source bundle ↓JSON ↗

ROOT CAUSE

The faulty implementation uses `updates` for the revalidation-304-merges-present-fields-and-retains-absent-fields decision.

VERIFIED REPAIR

Apply the explicit revalidation-304-merges-present-fields-and-retains-absent-fields contract, including the tested boundary and negative cases.

Unsuccessful approach: The attempted repair uses `dict(updates, **stored)` and still violates a separate fixture.

Case contract

Bounded offline decision model: revalidation 304 merges present fields and retains absent fields. Inputs are already validated protocol fields; the explicit fixtures define the supported policy, not a complete protocol implementation.

Why this case matters

This deterministic http caching model isolates the revalidation-304-merges-present-fields-and-retains-absent-fields policy at a network component boundary.

1 / The failure

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
import ipaddress
import re
from urllib.parse import urlsplit, urljoin
N = 1
observations = []
def solve(stored, updates):
    return updates
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
_fixtures = ["check('fixture 1', solve({'etag': 'a', 'type': 'text'}, {'etag': 'b'}), {'etag': 'b', 'type': 'text'})", "check('fixture 2', solve({'x': 1}, {}), {'x': 1})", "check('fixture 3', solve({}, {'x': 2}), {'x': 2})", "check('fixture 4', solve({}, {}), {})"]
for _line in _fixtures[N % len(_fixtures):] + _fixtures[:N % len(_fixtures)]:
    exec(_line)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
fixture 2{}{'x': 1}Failed
fixture 3{'x': 2}{'x': 2}Passed
fixture 4{}{}Passed
fixture 1{'etag': 'b'}{'etag': 'b', 'type': 'text'}Failed

SHA-256 / 82df867797c69b4f5ec66268f6963f1572a9b26de6c8f6c15ef37c0e83159307

2 / The unsuccessful fix

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
import ipaddress
import re
from urllib.parse import urlsplit, urljoin
N = 1
observations = []
def solve(stored, updates):
    return dict(updates, **stored)
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
_fixtures = ["check('fixture 1', solve({'etag': 'a', 'type': 'text'}, {'etag': 'b'}), {'etag': 'b', 'type': 'text'})", "check('fixture 2', solve({'x': 1}, {}), {'x': 1})", "check('fixture 3', solve({}, {'x': 2}), {'x': 2})", "check('fixture 4', solve({}, {}), {})"]
for _line in _fixtures[N % len(_fixtures):] + _fixtures[:N % len(_fixtures)]:
    exec(_line)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
fixture 2{'x': 1}{'x': 1}Passed
fixture 3{'x': 2}{'x': 2}Passed
fixture 4{}{}Passed
fixture 1{'etag': 'a', 'type': 'text'}{'etag': 'b', 'type': 'text'}Failed

SHA-256 / 7c12a05f64096ba6795b4cad3996d3fe0cdfa77f853514a2d3ff58e030603b81

3 / The verified repair

Exit 0
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
import ipaddress
import re
from urllib.parse import urlsplit, urljoin
N = 1
observations = []
def solve(stored, updates):
    return dict(stored, **updates)
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
_fixtures = ["check('fixture 1', solve({'etag': 'a', 'type': 'text'}, {'etag': 'b'}), {'etag': 'b', 'type': 'text'})", "check('fixture 2', solve({'x': 1}, {}), {'x': 1})", "check('fixture 3', solve({}, {'x': 2}), {'x': 2})", "check('fixture 4', solve({}, {}), {})"]
for _line in _fixtures[N % len(_fixtures):] + _fixtures[:N % len(_fixtures)]:
    exec(_line)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
fixture 2{'x': 1}{'x': 1}Passed
fixture 3{'x': 2}{'x': 2}Passed
fixture 4{}{}Passed
fixture 1{'etag': 'b', 'type': 'text'}{'etag': 'b', 'type': 'text'}Passed

SHA-256 / 93acdffdfc9f12b3796a772f45824e903dd04c5e020062bd3d4aa1ec222e2a34

Verification & scope

Bounded deterministic policy model over validated inputs; not a complete protocol stack or an interoperability claim. The five variants rotate the same explicit fixture set. This reproducer isolates one failure mechanism. Results cover the supplied fixtures. Variants within a family share a test contract and should remain grouped when constructing evaluation splits. Related mechanisms with a shared evaluation_group must also remain together; these controlled models are not independent production incidents.

Observations recorded using Python 3.12.14 at 2026-09-29T14:38:04.948606+00:00.

Case digest / 7a216355ecdd7ae1657a69dfe25d031e21a37443a2829f19327d39ce2918c377