FA-66287 / Aviation weight and balance / Member archive

Combined position limit compared with the heaviest member · case 02

Two side-by-side containers each under their own limit but over the pair limit are accepted.

Member previewVariant 2 · 3 implementations · 9 checks per implementation

Case contract

Input {'limits':{position: max kg},'combined':[[[positions], max kg]],'loads':{position: kg}}. Positions are visited in sorted order: unknown -> 'UNKNOWN:p', above its own limit -> 'POS:p'. Then each combined group in given order whose summed load (absent positions count 0) exceeds its cap -> 'COMB:a+b'. Limits are inclusive.

Why this case matters

Unit load device positions have individual limits and shared limits for side-by-side or zonal groups that constrain their sum.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
pair over combined	`[]`	`["COMB:11L+11R"]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.