FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-62874 / Insurance premium rating / Member archive

Workers compensation experience modification: Primary losses are split on the aggregate instead of per claim · case 04

Several moderate claims are treated as mostly excess, understating the mod.

Member previewVariant 4 · 3 implementations · 10 checks per implementation

Case contract

Input expected (cents, >0 else 'invalid expected'), split, weight W (per mille), primary_ratio (per mille of expected that is primary), ballast B, claims [[amount, 'ind'|'med']]. Medical-only claims count at 30%. Each claim splits into primary min(v,split) and excess. mod=(Ap+W*Ae+(1-W)*Ee+B)/(E+B), returned in hundredths rounded half-up.

Why this case matters

Experience rating multiplies manual premium, so a wrong split, weight or reduction shifts an employer's premium.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
mixed claim history 05762Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.

Sign in to the archive ↗