FA-59945 / Inventory cost layering / Member archive

Landed cost allocation to receipt layers: remainder ranking direction · case 05

Lines whose shares were truncated least receive the extra freight cents.

Member previewVariant 5 · 3 implementations · 8 checks per implementation

Case contract

Input {lines:[{sku,qty,unit_cost,weight(per unit)}], freight, duty_bp, basis:"weight"|"value"}. Freight is allocated in proportion to qty*weight (or line value); floor shares are topped up one cent at a time by largest remainder, ties to the earlier line. If the weight basis sums to zero, fall back to value; if that is zero too return {"error"}. Duty is round-half-up(line value*duty_bp/10000) on merchandise value only. Landed total = value+freight share+duty; unit = round-half-up(landed/qty).

Why this case matters

Inventory valuation and cost-of-goods decisions depend on this rule.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
weight basis	`[{"duty": 75, "freight": 717, "landed": 3792, "sku": "A", "unit": 379}, {"duty": 125, "freight": 288, "landed": 5413, "sku": "B", "unit": 5413}]`	`[{"duty": 75, "freight": 718, "landed": 3793, "sku": "A", "unit": 379}, {"duty": 125, "freight": 287, "landed": 5412, "sku": "B", "unit": 5412}]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.