FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-54456 / Accessibility interaction semantics / Open access

Style changes fail to invalidate their own computed name · case 01

Style changes fail to invalidate their own computed name.

Verified by executionVariant 1 · 8 checks per implementationDownload source bundle ↓JSON ↗

ROOT CAUSE

The style provider decision in the name dependencies adapter violates its declared contract.

VERIFIED REPAIR

Apply the exact contract at the style provider decision: if kind == 'style': invalid.add(provider); continue

Unsuccessful approach: The local repair substitutes if kind == 'style': invalid.discard(provider); continue but still mishandles the regression fixtures.

Case contract

Input [cached_names,dependencies,mutations]. Dependencies [consumer,provider,channel] with channel name or description; only name affects cached names. Mutation [provider,kind] kind text,remove,style,unrelated; text/remove invalidate provider and all transitively dependent name consumers, style invalidates provider only, unrelated does nothing. Include only cached IDs in returned invalidated list but traverse uncached providers. Ignore cycles safely, preserve cache dictionary order in final result. Return [remaining_cache,invalidated_ids].

Why this case matters

Offline accessibility bridge model with explicit policy; useful for testing semantic API adapters independently of browser implementations.

1 / The failure

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(data):
    cache,dependencies,mutations = data
    reverse = {}
    for consumer,provider,channel in dependencies:
        if channel == 'name': reverse.setdefault(provider,[]).append(consumer)
    invalid = set()
    for provider,kind in mutations:
        if kind == 'style': continue
        if kind not in ('text','remove'): continue
        pending = [provider]
        seen = set()
        while pending:
            node = pending.pop()
            if node in seen: continue
            seen.add(node)
            invalid.add(node)
            pending.extend(reverse.get(node,[]))
    return [{key:value for key,value in cache.items() if key not in invalid},[key for key in cache if key in invalid]]
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('contract fixture 1', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B','c':str(N),'keep':'K'},[['b','a','name'],['c','b','name']],[['a','text']]],), [{'keep':'K'},['a','b','c']])
check('contract fixture 2', solve([{'c':'C'},[['c','missing','name']],[['missing','remove']]],), [{},['c']])
check('contract fixture 3', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','description']],[['a','text']]],), [{'b':'B'},['a']])
check('contract fixture 4', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','name']],[['a','style']]],), [{'b':'B'},['a']])
check('contract fixture 5', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','name'],['a','b','name']],[['a','unrelated']]],), [{'a':'A','b':'B'},[]])
check('contract fixture 6', solve([{'z':'Z','a':'A'},[['a','z','name'],['z','a','name']],[['z','text']]],), [{},['z','a']])
check('contract fixture 7', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[],[['a','text'],['b','text']]],), [{},['a','b']])
check('contract fixture 8', solve([{'n'+str(i):'Name'+str(i) for i in range(N+2)},[['n'+str(i),'n'+str(i-1),'name'] for i in range(1,N+2)],[['n0','text']]],), [{},['n'+str(i) for i in range(N+2)]])
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
contract fixture 1[{'keep': 'K'}, ['a', 'b', 'c']][{'keep': 'K'}, ['a', 'b', 'c']]Passed
contract fixture 2[{}, ['c']][{}, ['c']]Passed
contract fixture 3[{'b': 'B'}, ['a']][{'b': 'B'}, ['a']]Passed
contract fixture 4[{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B'}, []][{'b': 'B'}, ['a']]Failed
contract fixture 5[{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B'}, []][{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B'}, []]Passed
contract fixture 6[{}, ['z', 'a']][{}, ['z', 'a']]Passed
contract fixture 7[{}, ['a', 'b']][{}, ['a', 'b']]Passed
contract fixture 8[{}, ['n0', 'n1', 'n2']][{}, ['n0', 'n1', 'n2']]Passed

SHA-256 / 639ec6fc0cbb806b7d59f90751809787c5b2b41d5defc4134caf957a416b02fc

2 / The unsuccessful fix

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(data):
    cache,dependencies,mutations = data
    reverse = {}
    for consumer,provider,channel in dependencies:
        if channel == 'name': reverse.setdefault(provider,[]).append(consumer)
    invalid = set()
    for provider,kind in mutations:
        if kind == 'style': invalid.discard(provider); continue
        if kind not in ('text','remove'): continue
        pending = [provider]
        seen = set()
        while pending:
            node = pending.pop()
            if node in seen: continue
            seen.add(node)
            invalid.add(node)
            pending.extend(reverse.get(node,[]))
    return [{key:value for key,value in cache.items() if key not in invalid},[key for key in cache if key in invalid]]
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('contract fixture 1', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B','c':str(N),'keep':'K'},[['b','a','name'],['c','b','name']],[['a','text']]],), [{'keep':'K'},['a','b','c']])
check('contract fixture 2', solve([{'c':'C'},[['c','missing','name']],[['missing','remove']]],), [{},['c']])
check('contract fixture 3', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','description']],[['a','text']]],), [{'b':'B'},['a']])
check('contract fixture 4', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','name']],[['a','style']]],), [{'b':'B'},['a']])
check('contract fixture 5', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','name'],['a','b','name']],[['a','unrelated']]],), [{'a':'A','b':'B'},[]])
check('contract fixture 6', solve([{'z':'Z','a':'A'},[['a','z','name'],['z','a','name']],[['z','text']]],), [{},['z','a']])
check('contract fixture 7', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[],[['a','text'],['b','text']]],), [{},['a','b']])
check('contract fixture 8', solve([{'n'+str(i):'Name'+str(i) for i in range(N+2)},[['n'+str(i),'n'+str(i-1),'name'] for i in range(1,N+2)],[['n0','text']]],), [{},['n'+str(i) for i in range(N+2)]])
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
contract fixture 1[{'keep': 'K'}, ['a', 'b', 'c']][{'keep': 'K'}, ['a', 'b', 'c']]Passed
contract fixture 2[{}, ['c']][{}, ['c']]Passed
contract fixture 3[{'b': 'B'}, ['a']][{'b': 'B'}, ['a']]Passed
contract fixture 4[{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B'}, []][{'b': 'B'}, ['a']]Failed
contract fixture 5[{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B'}, []][{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B'}, []]Passed
contract fixture 6[{}, ['z', 'a']][{}, ['z', 'a']]Passed
contract fixture 7[{}, ['a', 'b']][{}, ['a', 'b']]Passed
contract fixture 8[{}, ['n0', 'n1', 'n2']][{}, ['n0', 'n1', 'n2']]Passed

SHA-256 / c0152b7f9eac2ac91c1bc7771e2f57a94aab2e744d4101877a5f4da28cba4e89

3 / The verified repair

Exit 0
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(data):
    cache,dependencies,mutations = data
    reverse = {}
    for consumer,provider,channel in dependencies:
        if channel == 'name': reverse.setdefault(provider,[]).append(consumer)
    invalid = set()
    for provider,kind in mutations:
        if kind == 'style': invalid.add(provider); continue
        if kind not in ('text','remove'): continue
        pending = [provider]
        seen = set()
        while pending:
            node = pending.pop()
            if node in seen: continue
            seen.add(node)
            invalid.add(node)
            pending.extend(reverse.get(node,[]))
    return [{key:value for key,value in cache.items() if key not in invalid},[key for key in cache if key in invalid]]
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('contract fixture 1', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B','c':str(N),'keep':'K'},[['b','a','name'],['c','b','name']],[['a','text']]],), [{'keep':'K'},['a','b','c']])
check('contract fixture 2', solve([{'c':'C'},[['c','missing','name']],[['missing','remove']]],), [{},['c']])
check('contract fixture 3', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','description']],[['a','text']]],), [{'b':'B'},['a']])
check('contract fixture 4', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','name']],[['a','style']]],), [{'b':'B'},['a']])
check('contract fixture 5', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[['b','a','name'],['a','b','name']],[['a','unrelated']]],), [{'a':'A','b':'B'},[]])
check('contract fixture 6', solve([{'z':'Z','a':'A'},[['a','z','name'],['z','a','name']],[['z','text']]],), [{},['z','a']])
check('contract fixture 7', solve([{'a':'A','b':'B'},[],[['a','text'],['b','text']]],), [{},['a','b']])
check('contract fixture 8', solve([{'n'+str(i):'Name'+str(i) for i in range(N+2)},[['n'+str(i),'n'+str(i-1),'name'] for i in range(1,N+2)],[['n0','text']]],), [{},['n'+str(i) for i in range(N+2)]])
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
contract fixture 1[{'keep': 'K'}, ['a', 'b', 'c']][{'keep': 'K'}, ['a', 'b', 'c']]Passed
contract fixture 2[{}, ['c']][{}, ['c']]Passed
contract fixture 3[{'b': 'B'}, ['a']][{'b': 'B'}, ['a']]Passed
contract fixture 4[{'b': 'B'}, ['a']][{'b': 'B'}, ['a']]Passed
contract fixture 5[{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B'}, []][{'a': 'A', 'b': 'B'}, []]Passed
contract fixture 6[{}, ['z', 'a']][{}, ['z', 'a']]Passed
contract fixture 7[{}, ['a', 'b']][{}, ['a', 'b']]Passed
contract fixture 8[{}, ['n0', 'n1', 'n2']][{}, ['n0', 'n1', 'n2']]Passed

SHA-256 / e645a0316d8b287c7f412db935226168d348f64cc645fd0080cb175a3b625512

Verification & scope

Stipulated finite adapter contract, not a claim of platform accessibility or ARIA conformance. This reproducer isolates one failure mechanism. Results cover the supplied fixtures. Variants within a family share a test contract and should remain grouped when constructing evaluation splits. Related mechanisms with a shared evaluation_group must also remain together; these controlled models are not independent production incidents.

Observations recorded using Python 3.12.14 at 2026-09-29T14:45:48.541143+00:00.

Case digest / 691fbed1bfa696cd41886ac5d42d46f3471ddb35322887ee26dc334ddf6040d7