FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-5346 / Integer arithmetic / Open access

Nearest multiple ties up · case 01

Banker rounding violates the upward midpoint convention.

Verified by executionVariant 1 · 5 checks per implementationDownload source bundle ↓JSON ↗

ROOT CAUSE

Banker rounding violates the upward midpoint convention.

VERIFIED REPAIR

Apply the specified mathematical contract directly, preserving all terms and boundary cases: return ((2*a + step) // (2*step))*step

Unsuccessful approach: Adding a full step rounds every nonmultiple upward and moves exact multiples.

Case contract

Integer arguments; denominators, steps, moduli, and bit widths are positive. Unsigned word inputs fit the specified width except where masking is explicitly the operation. Sequence sizes are nonnegative. Return the nearest multiple of step; exact halfway cases choose the greater signed result. Exact operational definition: ((2*a + step) // (2*step))*step

Why this case matters

Small exact fixtures expose this error without platform timing, external services, or probabilistic observations. Integer mathematics results depend on the stated convention.

1 / The failure

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
import math
import calendar
import statistics
import itertools
from fractions import Fraction
from datetime import date, datetime, timedelta, timezone
from decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP, ROUND_DOWN, ROUND_CEILING, ROUND_FLOOR

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(a, step):
    return round(a/step)*step
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('fixture 1: (5, 10)', solve(*(5, 10)), 10)
check('fixture 2: (4, 10)', solve(*(4, 10)), 0)
check('fixture 3: (-5, 10)', solve(*(-5, 10)), 0)
check('fixture 4: (-6, 10)', solve(*(-6, 10)), -10)
check('fixture 5: (20, 10)', solve(*(20, 10)), 20)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
fixture 1: (5, 10)010Failed
fixture 2: (4, 10)00Passed
fixture 3: (-5, 10)00Passed
fixture 4: (-6, 10)-10-10Passed
fixture 5: (20, 10)2020Passed

SHA-256 / 0c32ce0b86d7fd3877e5f203e13e4df0897858e56e91912cf4177d95f364e38b

2 / The unsuccessful fix

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
import math
import calendar
import statistics
import itertools
from fractions import Fraction
from datetime import date, datetime, timedelta, timezone
from decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP, ROUND_DOWN, ROUND_CEILING, ROUND_FLOOR

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(a, step):
    return ((a + step) // step)*step
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('fixture 1: (5, 10)', solve(*(5, 10)), 10)
check('fixture 2: (4, 10)', solve(*(4, 10)), 0)
check('fixture 3: (-5, 10)', solve(*(-5, 10)), 0)
check('fixture 4: (-6, 10)', solve(*(-6, 10)), -10)
check('fixture 5: (20, 10)', solve(*(20, 10)), 20)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
fixture 1: (5, 10)1010Passed
fixture 2: (4, 10)100Failed
fixture 3: (-5, 10)00Passed
fixture 4: (-6, 10)0-10Failed
fixture 5: (20, 10)3020Failed

SHA-256 / e3fd984e777f67c881d10dfa0bb6981de181e6a9732c777ba44ef26a764ac61d

3 / The verified repair

Exit 0
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
import math
import calendar
import statistics
import itertools
from fractions import Fraction
from datetime import date, datetime, timedelta, timezone
from decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP, ROUND_DOWN, ROUND_CEILING, ROUND_FLOOR

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(a, step):
    return ((2*a + step) // (2*step))*step
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('fixture 1: (5, 10)', solve(*(5, 10)), 10)
check('fixture 2: (4, 10)', solve(*(4, 10)), 0)
check('fixture 3: (-5, 10)', solve(*(-5, 10)), 0)
check('fixture 4: (-6, 10)', solve(*(-6, 10)), -10)
check('fixture 5: (20, 10)', solve(*(20, 10)), 20)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
fixture 1: (5, 10)1010Passed
fixture 2: (4, 10)00Passed
fixture 3: (-5, 10)00Passed
fixture 4: (-6, 10)-10-10Passed
fixture 5: (20, 10)2020Passed

SHA-256 / 51d904438827e2fafc310ac31a0de1be1e80d786155ec739b66223940748fe1f

Verification & scope

This reproducer isolates one failure mechanism. Results cover the supplied fixtures. Variants within a family share a test contract and should remain grouped when constructing evaluation splits. Related mechanisms with a shared evaluation_group must also remain together; these controlled models are not independent production incidents.

Observations recorded using Python 3.12.14 at 2026-09-29T14:37:48.555460+00:00.

Case digest / c424804d7e2c44c379121d7b6ecb907bba945dc3bb4bb30dfed0906fd8ed14a2