FA-43650 / Borrow checking / Member archive

Borrow-dependent fields are destroyed in a reordered declaration sequence · case 05

Borrow-dependent fields are destroyed in a reordered declaration sequence.

Member previewVariant 5 · 3 implementations · 21 checks per implementation

Case contract

Check destructor-specific lifetime obligations. Destructor-read referents live at drop point; field destruction follows declaration order; explicit manual drop removes only its own drop obligation; may_dangle relaxation excludes observed parameters; owning phantom markers restore transitive drop obligations; arrays repeat element obligations even at nonzero symbolic lengths; partial move prohibited for custom-drop values; recursive drop dependencies need a visited set but may not skip distinct substitutions; unwinding runs initialized-field drops; destructor receiver borrow stays live through the whole body. Input is a fully explicit descriptor of the stated toy IR. Return rule identifiers in declaration order; absent optional obligations use the provided neutral defaults. No rule is an assertion about a production language.

Why this case matters

A finite offline static-analysis model of ownership and borrowing; it does not execute the analyzed program.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
field-drop-order regression 0	`[]`	`["field-drop-order"]`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.