FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-39222 / Tree accessibility / Member archive

Lazy subtree inherited check intent: Explicit unchecked descendant override is ignored · case 02

Explicit unchecked descendant override is ignored produces the wrong hierarchical widget state in a regression fixture.

Member previewVariant 2 · 3 implementations · 7 checks per implementation

Case contract

Checking an incompletely loaded branch stores inherited intent. Loaded writable descendants receive nearest ancestor intent unless they have an explicit override. Disabled descendants keep stored state. A fully loaded empty branch removes obsolete intent; pending intent remains for unknown descendants.

Why this case matters

Offline executable model of a hierarchical accessibility interaction; inputs are bounded and valid as stipulated. No browser, assistive technology, or normative ARIA conformance is claimed.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
inherit[{"b": true, "q": true, "r": true}, {"a": true, "c": true, "d": true, "e": true, "v0": true, "v1": true, "z": true}, {"b": true, "q": true}, ["z", "a", "c", "d", "e", "v0", "v1"]][{"b": true, "q": true, "r": true}, {"a": false, "c": true, "d": true, "e": true, "v0": true, "v1": true, "z": true}, {"b": true, "q": true}, ["z", "c", "d", "e", "v0", "v1"]]Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.

Sign in to the archive ↗