FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-31281 / Keyboard interactions / Open access

Keyboard layout mapping generations: Disconnect removes the wrong generation records · case 01

The event trace violates the disconnect generation rule and produces incorrect keyboard state or command output.

Verified by executionVariant 1 · 9 checks per implementationDownload source bundle ↓JSON ↗

ROOT CAUSE

Disconnect removes the wrong generation records.

THE FAILURE

Disconnect removes the wrong generation records.

Unsuccessful approach: The partial repair changes this transition to generations.pop(a,None), which still violates the model contract on the explicit regression traces.

Case contract

Events [kind,device,a,b]. layout replaces device generation a and clears cached labels; map caches physical code a to label b in current generation; lookup emits cached label or code a as fallback. Disconnect removes generation and cache. Maps and lookups before layout are ignored. Return emitted labels, generations and cached [device,code,label] rows. Inputs are finite ordered event traces; return the stated deterministic state. Batch entries are independent. N varies the number of independent input transactions.

Why this case matters

Controlled keyboard event processing model for debugging application event logic.

1 / The failure

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(cases):
    def run(c):
        generations={}; cache={}; out=[]
        for kind,device,a,b in c:
            if kind=='layout':
                generations[device]=a
                cache={k:v for k,v in cache.items() if k[0]!=device}
            elif kind=='map' and device in generations:
                cache[(device,a)]=b
            elif kind=='lookup' and device in generations:
                out.append(cache.get((device,a),a))
            elif kind=='disconnect':
                generations.clear()
                cache={k:v for k,v in cache.items() if k[0]!=device}
        return [out,sorted([[k,v] for k,v in generations.items()]),sorted([[d,k,v] for (d,k),v in cache.items()])]
    return [run(c) for c in cases]
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('layout-cache scenario 0', solve([[]] * N), [[[], [], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 1', solve([[['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['lookup', 'a', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[[], [], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 2', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['lookup', 'a', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[['x'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'x']]]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 3', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'y'], ['lookup', 'a', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[['y'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'y']]]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 4', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['layout', 'a', 2, ''], ['lookup', 'a', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[['KeyA'], [['a', 2]], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 5', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['layout', 'b', 2, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['map', 'b', 'KeyB', 'y'], ['layout', 'a', 3, '']]] * N), [[[], [['a', 3], ['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 6', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['lookup', 'b', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[[], [['a', 1]], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 7', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['lookup', 'a', 'Unknown', 'fallback']]] * N), [[['Unknown'], [['a', 1]], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 8', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['layout', 'b', 2, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['map', 'b', 'KeyB', 'y'], ['disconnect', 'a', '', '']]] * N), [[[], [['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]] * N)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
layout-cache scenario 0[[[], [], []]][[[], [], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 1[[[], [], []]][[[], [], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 2[[['x'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'x']]]][[['x'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'x']]]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 3[[['y'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'y']]]][[['y'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'y']]]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 4[[['KeyA'], [['a', 2]], []]][[['KeyA'], [['a', 2]], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 5[[[], [['a', 3], ['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]][[[], [['a', 3], ['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 6[[[], [['a', 1]], []]][[[], [['a', 1]], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 7[[['Unknown'], [['a', 1]], []]][[['Unknown'], [['a', 1]], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 8[[[], [], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]][[[], [['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]]Failed

SHA-256 / cbde310eb76bfb9daac9e15bf21eae3b1b7f10186c23cc1b1a28ac87d2249e36

2 / The unsuccessful fix

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(cases):
    def run(c):
        generations={}; cache={}; out=[]
        for kind,device,a,b in c:
            if kind=='layout':
                generations[device]=a
                cache={k:v for k,v in cache.items() if k[0]!=device}
            elif kind=='map' and device in generations:
                cache[(device,a)]=b
            elif kind=='lookup' and device in generations:
                out.append(cache.get((device,a),a))
            elif kind=='disconnect':
                generations.pop(a,None)
                cache={k:v for k,v in cache.items() if k[0]!=device}
        return [out,sorted([[k,v] for k,v in generations.items()]),sorted([[d,k,v] for (d,k),v in cache.items()])]
    return [run(c) for c in cases]
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('layout-cache scenario 0', solve([[]] * N), [[[], [], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 1', solve([[['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['lookup', 'a', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[[], [], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 2', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['lookup', 'a', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[['x'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'x']]]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 3', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'y'], ['lookup', 'a', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[['y'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'y']]]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 4', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['layout', 'a', 2, ''], ['lookup', 'a', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[['KeyA'], [['a', 2]], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 5', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['layout', 'b', 2, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['map', 'b', 'KeyB', 'y'], ['layout', 'a', 3, '']]] * N), [[[], [['a', 3], ['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 6', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['lookup', 'b', 'KeyA', '']]] * N), [[[], [['a', 1]], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 7', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['lookup', 'a', 'Unknown', 'fallback']]] * N), [[['Unknown'], [['a', 1]], []]] * N)
check('layout-cache scenario 8', solve([[['layout', 'a', 1, ''], ['layout', 'b', 2, ''], ['map', 'a', 'KeyA', 'x'], ['map', 'b', 'KeyB', 'y'], ['disconnect', 'a', '', '']]] * N), [[[], [['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]] * N)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
layout-cache scenario 0[[[], [], []]][[[], [], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 1[[[], [], []]][[[], [], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 2[[['x'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'x']]]][[['x'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'x']]]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 3[[['y'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'y']]]][[['y'], [['a', 1]], [['a', 'KeyA', 'y']]]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 4[[['KeyA'], [['a', 2]], []]][[['KeyA'], [['a', 2]], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 5[[[], [['a', 3], ['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]][[[], [['a', 3], ['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 6[[[], [['a', 1]], []]][[[], [['a', 1]], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 7[[['Unknown'], [['a', 1]], []]][[['Unknown'], [['a', 1]], []]]Passed
layout-cache scenario 8[[[], [['a', 1], ['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]][[[], [['b', 2]], [['b', 'KeyB', 'y']]]]Failed

SHA-256 / 5541477ee6869c0138b50c0c769048bc1942e8cbf705a7fad84f5a9d5d84660a

HELD IN THE MEMBER ARCHIVE

The verified repair and its recorded checks are member-only.

This mechanism has 9 recorded checks per implementation. The open-access tier publishes the failure and the unsuccessful fix; the repaired source that passes every check, and the observations that prove it, are available to members.

Every case sharing this mechanism uses the same contract and the same repair, so this one record is held back for all of them.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the repair.

Sign in to the archive ↗

Verification & scope

Offline stipulated event model, not a browser implementation or web standard conformance claim. This reproducer isolates one failure mechanism. Results cover the supplied fixtures. Variants within a family share a test contract and should remain grouped when constructing evaluation splits. Related mechanisms with a shared evaluation_group must also remain together; these controlled models are not independent production incidents.

Observations recorded using Python 3.12.14 at 2026-09-29T14:42:00.606176+00:00.

Case digest / c03765770c853a81523eb8a3d8eb52eda55e2a62424cbd1c06d5fd23f76d3aca