FA-26162 / Filter interfaces / Member archive

Disabled user operands consume operand quota while enforced operands are exempt · case 02

Disabled user operands consume operand quota while enforced operands are exempt is violated by the widget projection.

Member previewVariant 2 · 3 implementations · 10 checks per implementation

Case contract

Filter-builder quotas separately bound user rows, nested groups and set operands; disabled user rows still consume edit capacity but enforced rows are exempt. This example checks: Disabled user operands consume operand quota while enforced operands are exempt.

Why this case matters

Filter-widget state and serialization must preserve user constraints while the view changes.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixture	Actual	Expected	Outcome
contract fixture 0	`{"group-cost": 0, "operand-cost": 1, "remaining-rows": 0, "replace-capacity": true, "row-add-gate": false, "set-cost": 0}`	`{"group-cost": 0, "operand-cost": 3, "remaining-rows": 0, "replace-capacity": true, "row-add-gate": false, "set-cost": 0}`	Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.