FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-25635 / Filter interfaces / Member archive

Same-field user constraints do not overwrite enforced scope operands · case 05

Same-field user constraints do not overwrite enforced scope operands is violated by the widget projection.

Member previewVariant 5 · 3 implementations · 10 checks per implementation

Case contract

System-enforced filter constraints are immutable and survive user resets; user and system operands with the same field remain separate conjuncts. This example checks: Same-field user constraints do not overwrite enforced scope operands.

Why this case matters

Filter-widget state and serialization must preserve user constraints while the view changes.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
contract fixture 0{"effective-conjunction": [3], "export-user": [{"field": "a", "system": false, "value": 2}, {"field": "a", "system": false, "value": 3}], "removal-control": true, "reset-survivors": [{"field": "a", "system": true, "value": 1}], "system-badge": "", "user-count": 2}{"effective-conjunction": [1, 2, 3], "export-user": [{"field": "a", "system": false, "value": 2}, {"field": "a", "system": false, "value": 3}], "removal-control": true, "reset-survivors": [{"field": "a", "system": true, "value": 1}], "system-badge": "", "user-count": 2}Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.

Sign in to the archive ↗