FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-25035 / Filter interfaces / Member archive

Preset matching compares criterion identities independent of presentation order · case 05

Preset matching compares criterion identities independent of presentation order is violated by the widget projection.

Member previewVariant 5 · 3 implementations · 10 checks per implementation

Case contract

Saved filter presets are tied to schema and scope; matching is order-insensitive, while dirty state and replacement preserve explicit ownership. This example checks: Preset matching compares criterion identities independent of presentation order.

Why this case matters

Filter-widget state and serialization must preserve user constraints while the view changes.

One recorded failure

Sample boundary fixture

This sample comes from the broken implementation of a controlled reproducer.

Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
contract fixture 0{"criteria-match": false, "dirty-marker": false, "fork-owner": "u", "overwrite-gate": true, "schema-gate": true, "scope-match": true}{"criteria-match": true, "dirty-marker": false, "fork-owner": "u", "overwrite-gate": true, "schema-gate": true, "scope-match": true}Failed

MEMBER ARCHIVE

The complete case is available to members.

This record includes three runnable implementations, regression fixtures, execution results, and source hashes.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the sources.

Sign in to the archive ↗