FAILURE MAP
← Case archive

FA-16681 / Floating-point arithmetic / Open access

Interpolation forms an overflowing difference across signs · case 01

Interpolation forms an overflowing difference across signs.

Verified by executionVariant 1 · 10 checks per implementationDownload source bundle ↓JSON ↗

ROOT CAUSE

Interpolation forms an overflowing difference across signs. The faulty expression is result=a+t*(b-a).

THE FAILURE

Interpolation forms an overflowing difference across signs. The faulty expression is result=a+t*(b-a).

Unsuccessful approach: The attempted local correction result=a+t*min(b-a,1e308) still violates the explicit regression fixtures.

Case contract

Interpolate finite a and b at t in [0,1], preserving endpoints and avoiding overflow in a difference or an endpoint sum. Return domain marker outside the interval. Finite results are rendered to eleven significant decimal digits; modeled domain violations and arithmetic errors are explicit strings.

Why this case matters

An offline floating representation model isolates a reproducible arithmetic fault.

1 / The failure

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
import math
import struct
def render(x):
    if math.isnan(x): return 'nan'
    if math.isinf(x): return '-infinity' if x<0 else '+infinity'
    return format(x,'.11g')

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(a,b,t):
    try:
        if not 0<=t<=1: return 'domain'
        if t==0: return render(a)
        if t==1: return render(b)
        if (a<=0<=b) or (b<=0<=a):
            result=a+t*(b-a)
        else:
            result=a+t*(b-a)
        result=min(max(a,b),max(min(a,b),result))
        return render(result)
    except (ValueError, OverflowError, ZeroDivisionError, TypeError):
        return "arithmetic-error"
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('opposite asymmetric', solve(-float(N),float(N),0.25), render(-N/2))
check('opposite extremes', solve(-1e308,1e308,0.5), "0")
check('same extremes', solve(1e308,1.5e308,0.5), render(1.25e308))
check('first endpoint', solve(-0.0,float(N),0.0), "-0")
check('last endpoint', solve(float(N),-0.0,1.0), "-0")
check('increasing', solve(float(N),float(N+8),0.25), render(N+2))
check('decreasing', solve(float(N+8),float(N),0.25), render(N+6))
check('negative same sign', solve(-float(N+8),-float(N),0.25), render(-N-6))
check('outside', solve(float(N),float(N+8),1.5), "domain")
check('tiny blend', solve(N*1e-300,3*N*1e-300,0.5), render(2*N*1e-300))
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
opposite asymmetric-0.5-0.5Passed
opposite extremes1e+3080Failed
same extremes1.25e+3081.25e+308Passed
first endpoint-0-0Passed
last endpoint-0-0Passed
increasing33Passed
decreasing77Passed
negative same sign-7-7Passed
outsidedomaindomainPassed
tiny blend2e-3002e-300Passed

SHA-256 / de3633cc5b007c7257d7b4f0d27814db7f1d6b3cfcd6b08ed9e3a8b5364b3898

2 / The unsuccessful fix

Exit 1
"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
import math
import struct
def render(x):
    if math.isnan(x): return 'nan'
    if math.isinf(x): return '-infinity' if x<0 else '+infinity'
    return format(x,'.11g')

N = 1
observations = []
def solve(a,b,t):
    try:
        if not 0<=t<=1: return 'domain'
        if t==0: return render(a)
        if t==1: return render(b)
        if (a<=0<=b) or (b<=0<=a):
            result=a+t*min(b-a,1e308)
        else:
            result=a+t*(b-a)
        result=min(max(a,b),max(min(a,b),result))
        return render(result)
    except (ValueError, OverflowError, ZeroDivisionError, TypeError):
        return "arithmetic-error"
def check(label, actual, expected):
    observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
check('opposite asymmetric', solve(-float(N),float(N),0.25), render(-N/2))
check('opposite extremes', solve(-1e308,1e308,0.5), "0")
check('same extremes', solve(1e308,1.5e308,0.5), render(1.25e308))
check('first endpoint', solve(-0.0,float(N),0.0), "-0")
check('last endpoint', solve(float(N),-0.0,1.0), "-0")
check('increasing', solve(float(N),float(N+8),0.25), render(N+2))
check('decreasing', solve(float(N+8),float(N),0.25), render(N+6))
check('negative same sign', solve(-float(N+8),-float(N),0.25), render(-N-6))
check('outside', solve(float(N),float(N+8),1.5), "domain")
check('tiny blend', solve(N*1e-300,3*N*1e-300,0.5), render(2*N*1e-300))
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
Boundary fixtureActualExpectedOutcome
opposite asymmetric-0.5-0.5Passed
opposite extremes-5e+3070Failed
same extremes1.25e+3081.25e+308Passed
first endpoint-0-0Passed
last endpoint-0-0Passed
increasing33Passed
decreasing77Passed
negative same sign-7-7Passed
outsidedomaindomainPassed
tiny blend2e-3002e-300Passed

SHA-256 / 72f7ac49eecaa6a4bcab68e73c5274e52517cd390c95d8bba5372fba20f0848c

HELD IN THE MEMBER ARCHIVE

The verified repair and its recorded checks are member-only.

This mechanism has 10 recorded checks per implementation. The open-access tier publishes the failure and the unsuccessful fix; the repaired source that passes every check, and the observations that prove it, are available to members.

Every case sharing this mechanism uses the same contract and the same repair, so this one record is held back for all of them.

Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the repair.

Sign in to the archive ↗

Verification & scope

Controlled binary64 or explicitly stipulated miniature format; no hardware exception flags or platform floating environment are modeled. This reproducer isolates one failure mechanism. Results cover the supplied fixtures. Variants within a family share a test contract and should remain grouped when constructing evaluation splits. Related mechanisms with a shared evaluation_group must also remain together; these controlled models are not independent production incidents.

Observations recorded using Python 3.12.14 at 2026-09-29T14:39:38.838009+00:00.

Case digest / 48869ad5b5600ccb9f34948f0e0daab560cd8af86ed87cb02a29f2408a84dd7d