FA-1371 / Concurrency / Open access
Acquire a distributed mutex: A request acquires a lock in another coordination namespace · case 01
The distributed lock operation is admitted even though a request acquires a lock in another coordination namespace.
ROOT CAUSE
The admission path omits the lock namespace invariant while validating the other operation preconditions.
THE FAILURE
The admission path omits the lock namespace invariant while validating the other operation preconditions.
Unsuccessful approach: Adding the lock namespace check repairs the reported defect, but replacing the adjacent lock available check loses that independent invariant.
Case contract
Return a Boolean admission decision for acquire a distributed mutex. The record r must satisfy all of: r['lock_available'] is None; r['waiter_turn'][0] == r['waiter_turn'][1][0]; r['owner_session'][0] < r['owner_session'][1]; r['fence_increase'][0] > r['fence_increase'][1]; r['lock_namespace'][0] == r['lock_namespace'][1]. Extra tracing fields are ignored; validation does not mutate the record.
Why this case matters
A deterministic local contract for concurrency. Each negative fixture violates exactly one invariant. No transport timing, persistence, cryptographic verification, or full protocol implementation is claimed.
1 / The failure
Exit 1"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
N = 1
observations = []
def solve(r):
return (r['lock_available'] is None) and (r['waiter_turn'][0] == r['waiter_turn'][1][0]) and (r['owner_session'][0] < r['owner_session'][1]) and (r['fence_increase'][0] > r['fence_increase'][1])
def check(label, actual, expected):
observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
r = {'lock_available': None, 'waiter_turn': ['a', ['a', 'b']], 'owner_session': [9, 10], 'fence_increase': [7, 6], 'lock_namespace': ['n1', 'n1']}
check('valid operation', solve(r), True)
check('Acquisition steals a currently held mutex', solve(dict(r, **{'lock_available': 'owner'})), False)
check('A newcomer bypasses the oldest eligible waiter', solve(dict(r, **{'waiter_turn': ['b', ['a', 'b']]})), False)
check('An expired session acquires a new mutex', solve(dict(r, **{'owner_session': [10, 10]})), False)
check('Reacquisition reuses the previous fencing token', solve(dict(r, **{'fence_increase': [6, 6]})), False)
check('A request acquires a lock in another coordination namespace', solve(dict(r, **{'lock_namespace': ['n2', 'n1']})), False)
check('unrelated tracing metadata', solve(dict(r, trace='run-'+str(N))), True)
check('repeat validation is pure', solve(r), True)
invalid = {'lock_available': 'owner', 'waiter_turn': ['b', ['a', 'b']], 'owner_session': [10, 10], 'fence_increase': [6, 6], 'lock_namespace': ['n2', 'n1']}
keys = list(invalid)
pair = {keys[N % len(keys)]: invalid[keys[N % len(keys)]], keys[(N+1) % len(keys)]: invalid[keys[(N+1) % len(keys)]]}
check('two independent violations in variant', solve(dict(r, **pair)), False)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
| Boundary fixture | Actual | Expected | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| valid operation | True | True | Passed |
| Acquisition steals a currently held mutex | False | False | Passed |
| A newcomer bypasses the oldest eligible waiter | False | False | Passed |
| An expired session acquires a new mutex | False | False | Passed |
| Reacquisition reuses the previous fencing token | False | False | Passed |
| A request acquires a lock in another coordination namespace | True | False | Failed |
| unrelated tracing metadata | True | True | Passed |
| repeat validation is pure | True | True | Passed |
| two independent violations in variant | False | False | Passed |
SHA-256 / 90a7e85e3b4b559680f11ed78579a65d29f83908ba249be5992568e8a7e57cce
2 / The unsuccessful fix
Exit 1"""Failure Map reference implementation. Python standard library only."""
import json
N = 1
observations = []
def solve(r):
return (r['waiter_turn'][0] == r['waiter_turn'][1][0]) and (r['owner_session'][0] < r['owner_session'][1]) and (r['fence_increase'][0] > r['fence_increase'][1]) and (r['lock_namespace'][0] == r['lock_namespace'][1])
def check(label, actual, expected):
observations.append({"check": label, "actual": actual, "expected": expected, "passed": actual == expected})
r = {'lock_available': None, 'waiter_turn': ['a', ['a', 'b']], 'owner_session': [9, 10], 'fence_increase': [7, 6], 'lock_namespace': ['n1', 'n1']}
check('valid operation', solve(r), True)
check('Acquisition steals a currently held mutex', solve(dict(r, **{'lock_available': 'owner'})), False)
check('A newcomer bypasses the oldest eligible waiter', solve(dict(r, **{'waiter_turn': ['b', ['a', 'b']]})), False)
check('An expired session acquires a new mutex', solve(dict(r, **{'owner_session': [10, 10]})), False)
check('Reacquisition reuses the previous fencing token', solve(dict(r, **{'fence_increase': [6, 6]})), False)
check('A request acquires a lock in another coordination namespace', solve(dict(r, **{'lock_namespace': ['n2', 'n1']})), False)
check('unrelated tracing metadata', solve(dict(r, trace='run-'+str(N))), True)
check('repeat validation is pure', solve(r), True)
invalid = {'lock_available': 'owner', 'waiter_turn': ['b', ['a', 'b']], 'owner_session': [10, 10], 'fence_increase': [6, 6], 'lock_namespace': ['n2', 'n1']}
keys = list(invalid)
pair = {keys[N % len(keys)]: invalid[keys[N % len(keys)]], keys[(N+1) % len(keys)]: invalid[keys[(N+1) % len(keys)]]}
check('two independent violations in variant', solve(dict(r, **pair)), False)
print(json.dumps({"observations": observations, "passed": all(x["passed"] for x in observations)}, ensure_ascii=False))
raise SystemExit(0 if all(x["passed"] for x in observations) else 1)
| Boundary fixture | Actual | Expected | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| valid operation | True | True | Passed |
| Acquisition steals a currently held mutex | True | False | Failed |
| A newcomer bypasses the oldest eligible waiter | False | False | Passed |
| An expired session acquires a new mutex | False | False | Passed |
| Reacquisition reuses the previous fencing token | False | False | Passed |
| A request acquires a lock in another coordination namespace | False | False | Passed |
| unrelated tracing metadata | True | True | Passed |
| repeat validation is pure | True | True | Passed |
| two independent violations in variant | False | False | Passed |
SHA-256 / 95328248e292feb81a5783dba8c8e0b51c6f7d0418cdefd77c33addc5a0444c2
HELD IN THE MEMBER ARCHIVE
The verified repair and its recorded checks are member-only.
This mechanism has 9 recorded checks per implementation. The open-access tier publishes the failure and the unsuccessful fix; the repaired source that passes every check, and the observations that prove it, are available to members.
Every case sharing this mechanism uses the same contract and the same repair, so this one record is held back for all of them.
Member access is invitation-based. Sign in with your invited account to inspect the repair.
Sign in to the archive ↗Verification & scope
This reproducer isolates one failure mechanism. Results cover the supplied fixtures. Variants within a family share a test contract and should remain grouped when constructing evaluation splits. Related mechanisms with a shared evaluation_group must also remain together; these controlled models are not independent production incidents.
Observations recorded using Python 3.12.14 at 2026-09-29T14:37:01.645170+00:00.
Case digest / 93be89a9bbe14c334c36af463713be42ba967a8bce2935442e37eac7b1e273e1